Established to objectively record North Korean human rights
violations and reveal the truth
Data Collection and Preservation
Collection and preservation of surveys of over 20,000 North Korean escapees, as well as records of testimony, press reports, memoirs, related literature, etc.
Analysis of incidents of human rights violations and related individuals are then encoded into the established Unified Human Rights Database, which employs international standards for human rights analysis
Ensuring Fairness and Objectivity
Research utilizing the Database, securing international cooperation, education of civil society, and research on transitional justice
The degree to which state violence and crimes against humanity occur within North Korea is very severe. However, the unfortunate truth is that collected testimonies first require proof of credibility, due to the reality that past human rights issues come to light only through the testimonies of those who defect from North Korea. Recognizing that securing fairness and objectivity through the establishment of a system that withstands this difficulty was of the utmost importance, the North Korean Human Rights Archives, an affiliate organization of NKDB, was created in 2007. Ever since, the North Korean Human Rights Archives has been conducting North Korean human rights analysis with professionality, concrete record keeping of said analysis, and systematic record preservation.
Thus far, NKDB’s North Korean Human Rights Archives has amassed data on over 120,000 cases relating to North Korean human rights, supported by in-depth interviews, and over 20,000 surveys of resettled North Korean escapees. This figure is made even more meaningful by the fact that its results were only made possible through the voluntary participation of North Korean escapees that directly experienced or witnessed human rights violations.
To obtain fair and objective accounts of North Korean escapees’ voices, NKDB’s North Korean Human Rights Archives records the accumulated accounts through the independently created Unified Human Rights Database, based on HURIDOCS’ OpenEvsys and Martus. To increase the accessibility and efficacy of the database in the future for communities both within South Korea and abroad, NKDB is planning and implementing an eclectic array of projects, including publication of the White Paper on North Korean Human Rights, hosting seminars both in South Korea and abroad, and establishing the Visual Atlas, an interactive map that shows North Korean human rights violations from a spatial perspective.
*NKDB conducts investigations and research with the first principle of protection for the witnesses and victims, as well as avoiding secondary harm to those currently in North Korea.
Yearly Publications of Reports and Seminars
(Domestic and International)
북한인권기록보존소 사건분석 과정
Collection and management of materials from North Korean human rights investigations, literature (i.e. books, magazines, newspapers) and miscellaneous evidential material
Applying standardized case investigation standards to review if the case: (1) violates international human rights norms; (2) punishment infringes on North Korean law (3) is a political crime (4) is a crime against humanity
Accumulating testimonies of human rights violation in North Korea by cross referencing new cases’ content and related individuals with existing cases, avoiding duplication of incidences of violations
Being cognizant of a case’s importance and associated urgency, and approaching it objectively before undertaking related research; advocating for the international civil society’s responsibility
North Korean Human Rights Archives’ Procedure in Case Analyses
Collection and management of materials from North Korean human rights investigations, literature (i.e. books, magazines, newspapers), and miscellaneous evidential material
Applying standardized case investigation techniques to review if the case: (1) violates international human rights norms; (2) punishment infringes on North Korean law (3) is a political crime (4) is a crime against humanity
Accumulating testimonies of human rights violation in North Korea by cross referencing new cases’ content and related individuals with existing cases, avoiding duplication of incidents of violations
Cognizant of a case’s importance and associated urgency, and approaching it objectively before undertaking related research; advocating for international civil society’s responsibility
cases of human rights violations
Updated July 2022
Why do we talk about North Korean human rights?
‘Recording Data on North Korean Human Rights - A Task for the Present and Future’
The 2014 UN report of the Commission of Inquiry on Human Rights in the Democratic People’s Republic of Korea asserted that extensive and systematic “crimes against humanity” were occurring in North Korea, and the international community was once again alerted to the severity of human rights issues in North Korea. This incident is emblematic of the fact that addressing the crimes against humanity that are occurring in North Korea is not only an issue for North Korea or the Korean Peninsula, but one akin to the international community’s mission to preserve its universal values for humanity.
Since the division of the Korean Peninsula, North Koreans have seen their basic rights systematically oppressed under the surveillance of the state, and their attempts at resistance and voicing their longing for freedom controlled under the guise of crimes against the state as well as crimes against the Korean people. If North Koreans push back, the North Korean state arrests them, places them in political prison camps, and even arrests their family members under the assumption of guilt-by-association.
To address this brutality, the Database Center for North Korean Human Rights, through victims and survivors of human rights violations in North Korea, not only collect and analyze cases they have directly experienced, but also cases they witnessed in North Korea or heard about. We maintain these records with a sense of duty that the victims and survivors of human rights violations must be represented.
Transitional justice for North Korea’s perpetration of human rights violations
is an inevitable reality that cannot be evaded or overlooked
Transitional justice with regards to North Korean human rights violations is a critical task that will spearhead the beginning of reunification as well as the notion of social justice. Records on North Korean human rights violations will be utilized in the midst of this process towards justice as evidence for legal processes for cases of human rights violations that have occurred within North Korea. In addition, these records are invaluable materials that will serve as a focal point in social discourse about North Korean human rights issues, and serve as a foundation for providing direct relief to victims.
The North Korean Human Rights Archives, cognizant of the importance of records on North Korean human rights for these reasons, operates with the goal of collecting and recording as many instances of North Korean human rights violations as possible, and separately operates a North Korean human rights data facility to preserve the collected materials. These materials are critical assets that will be registered in the future with the UNESCO Memory of the World Program and will serve as a foundation for the establishment of a memorial dedicated to North Korean human rights.
Pushing for the establishment of a memorial
dedicated to North Korean Human Rights
Pursuing registration with the UNESCO
Memory of the World Program
Established in 2003, with former West Germany’s Central Registry of State Judicial Administration (Zentrale Erfassungsstelle) as a Benchmark
In 1961, during Germany’s period of division, West Germany established the Central Registry of State Judicial Administration (Zentrale Erfassungsstelle) to hold East Germany’s government criminally liable for its brutal human rights violations. It was here that active West German prosecutors recorded incidents of East Germany’s human rights violations on the basis of East German defectors until Germany’s reunification, the number of cases reaching 43,000 by the time of reunification. Following reunification, materials from the Central Registry of State Judicial Administration in Salzgitter were used not only to financially support the victims, but also served as the basis for the trial and punishment of perpetrators. This series of events played an important role in achieving transitional justice for crimes that occurred in former East Germany.
The relevant lead prosecutor strongly pushed back on all accusations that the registry in Salzgitter only existed for emotional revenge. The prosecutor said that “the importance of the registry is not in facilitating the prosecution of 10 border guards for murder, but rather in rescuing future refugees (defectors). No one can resuscitate those who already perished.” Accordingly, those involved in the prosecutions relevant to the registry saw it as their sworn duty to even go so far as the international border in order to appeal to the conscience of border guards.
Source: Central Registry of State Judicial Administration in Salzgitter, West Germany, Heiner Sauer, Hans Otto Plumeyer (translated by NKDB), 2007
Salzgitter’s Central Registry of State Judicial Administration is seen as a registry not to collect evidence for the sake of revenge, but to achieve justice. Germany, reunited with a foundation of effort to realize justice, to this day continues down a path to reconciliation and harmony and is a model for the international community.
Database Center for North Korean Human Rights (NKDB) 북한인권정보센터
3rd Floor, 14 Gyeonghuigung-gil, Jongno-gu, Seoul, Republic of Korea
(03175) 서울 종로구 경희궁길 14, 신영빌딩 3층
TEL : 02-723-6045 E-Mail : firstname.lastname@example.org